Learner Reviews & Feedback for Build Better Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) by DeepLearning.AI
About the Course
Top reviews
PK
Jan 25, 2021
I found that week 2 in this course is very abstract and non-technical thus I didn't like it. Week 1 and 3 were filled with relevant information and the final assignments were quite nice to accomplish.
HD
Nov 4, 2022
Interesting subject and a very good learning experience overall. Looking forward to the third course in this specialisation as time allows.
101 - 101 of 101 Reviews for Build Better Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs)
By Philip R K
•Dec 12, 2025
Review: This course was a complete waste of time. Weeks 1–3 promised to teach “state‑of‑the‑art GANs” but delivered little more than hype, repetition, and links to external papers. Instead of actual instruction, the content was padded with congratulatory mimicry passages, optional labs, and “works cited” lists that simply redirected learners to arXiv papers, Medium blogs, or GitHub repos. Assignments demanded complex PyTorch implementations (StyleGAN, BigGAN, etc.), yet the lectures and notes provided no scaffolding or walkthroughs. The most advanced material was labeled “optional” and outsourced to dense research papers or gated blog posts, leaving learners unsupported. Even the acknowledgments list dozens of contributors, but the output is hollow — exposure without teaching. The result is credential theater: you’re told you’ve mastered GANs, but the course never actually teaches them. If you want to truly understand GAN architectures, you’ll need to study the original papers yourself. This specialization performs instruction rather than delivering it, and Weeks 1–3 prove that certification is prioritized over comprehension. Bottom line: Don’t waste your time. One star.