This course was worth taking and I learn a lot. However, it was advertized for users of all levels. The python portion of the course moves at a pace that is extremely difficult to keep up with. I thought that I just wasn't getting the material but after using a python book recommended by a friend, I realized that this course moves at an extremely fast pace, and it seems that you need some kind of programming background to be able to complete it. I had to use a book, internet searches, and get tutoring in order to do some of the assignments. This course was way more difficult than I expected for an entry-level course.

The first three weeks were very well presented and instructed. It was challenging and interesting for me (I don't have a computer science background). However, the pace and level of difficulty are accelerated in Week 4. You're expected to go from having no Python knowledge to being able to solve multiple-step programming assignments which the videos give a cursory explanation to. The videos would probably be sufficient for someone who already has a strong Python or programming background.

The first 3 weeks of the course are very enlightening for someone new to computer science, but the fourth week of the course suffers from a significant difficulty spike when trying to answer questions involving python programming. Issues include expecting the learner to know concepts not mentioned in videos and a lack of help with python programming questions.

This "course" is mostly advertising of Penn's online programmes. Very basic information, even automatic tests require upgrade. Actually it is not a course at all, just a teaser.

Assignment instructions are so convuluted that they cause more confusion than provide clear or understandable instructions. (must be revised)

+ interesting introduintroduction to Computer thinking

- extremely very low audio videos , some examples are tedious and shoehorned

There are giant leaps in logic for the assignments using python. It was not friendly for someone with no python experience.

Not very rigorous course. However, it is OK for an introductory course for non CS students.

Loads of peer-review, Not my favorite, but I see why it is necesssary.

it was nice But not in deep.

This course is disappointing. It does not provide useful information in the first 3 weeks, and rush to python introduction in the lask week without enough excise and clarification.

a. The course needs more examples real-time

b. This course is fit for the technical people who writes coding.

c. non-coding people - this course is a greek and latin for you

Super helpful topic, but expect to spend way more time than advertised on some of these assignments, depending on your level of knowledge. Not a simple course to complete.

Terrible. Too many bugs in the autograder. Need more specific guidelines for submission in section 4.8

Boring, not application based.

How this help me on the job?

4주차 과제가 너무 어려웠어요